goat anti human prox1 (R&D Systems)
Structured Review

Goat Anti Human Prox1, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 339 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/goat anti human prox1/product/R&D Systems
Average 96 stars, based on 339 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Breast Cancer Remodels Lymphatics in Sentinel Lymph Nodes"
Article Title: Breast Cancer Remodels Lymphatics in Sentinel Lymph Nodes
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.1101/2024.12.30.630756
Figure Legend Snippet: a, UMAP plot of LECs from distant LNs (left) or metastatic LNs (right), color coded by cluster. b, Proportion of each LEC subset in distant and metastatic LNs, calculated from nine patients LECs (two-tailed, paired Student’s t-test), *p <0.05. c, Differential abundance testing using miloR. Neighborhoods are colored by their log fold abundance change between distant (blue) and metastatic (red) LNs. Non-differential abundance neighborhoods (FDR > 10%) are colored white. d, Beeswarm plot of the cell subset distribution of log fold change between normal and distant LNs. e, The trajectories of LN LEC differentiation shown in a UMAP plot. Six distinct LEC trajectories (T1-T6) were identified using Monocle single-cell trajectory analysis. f, Immunostaining of cancer cells and LEC markers PROX1 and MARCO in non-metastatic (left) and metastatic LNs (right). Zoomed-in images displaying SCS containing cytokeratin + cancer cells (left) and medullary sinuses (MS) both with and without cancer cells (right). A cancer cell in the MARCO + sinus is indicated by an arrow. Blue, cytokeratin; red, PROX1; green, MARCO. Scale bars, 500 μm. Images are representatives of two individuals with similar results. g, Immunostaining of CD200 + lymphatics and its quantification in metastatic (upper, black background) and non-metastatic (lower, grey background) LNs. CD200 + lymphatics and individual cancer cells within lymphatics are indicated by arrows and arrowheads, respectively. Blue, cytokeratin; green, PROX1; red, CD200. Scale bars, 500 μm. Images are representatives of seven individuals with simar results. SCS: subcapsular sinus; MS: medullary sinus; B: B cell zone. Circles in the bar plots represent biological replicates (mean±SEM, two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-test). **p <0.005.
Techniques Used: Two Tailed Test, Immunostaining
Figure Legend Snippet: a, Differential abundance testing using MiloR and a heatmap of differentially expressed genes between differential abundance neighborhoods in LN LECs. The UMAP plot was shown in and is inserted here for clarity. In the heatmap, columns and rows represent neighborhoods and differentially expressed genes, respectively. Expression values for each gene are scaled between 0 and 1. The upper panel of the heatmap shows the neighborhood log fold change. FDR, false discovery rate. b, Heatmap showing the expression of the top DEGs between metastatic and distant LNs for each cell. Bars above the heatmap indicate the tissue and cluster origin of each cell (LNs, clusters). c, Violin plots displaying the top DEG expression between metastatic and distant LNs by cluster, with log-normalized expression value labeled. d, Immunostaining of MGP and its quantification in metastatic and distant LNs. Zoomed-in images show SCS and medullary sinuses containing cancer cells and MGP expression on PROX1 + LECs (arrows). Blue, cytokeratin; red, MGP; green, PROX1. Scale bars, 125 μm. Images are representative of four individuals with similar results. Circles in the bar plots represent biological replicates (mean±SEM, two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-test). *p <0.05. e, Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of the top DEGs between metastatic and distant LNs using EnrichR package.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Labeling, Immunostaining, Two Tailed Test
